Tag Archives: Miami

Grove Isle Club to stay open pending legal case(s)

Quick Update:  The Grove Isle Club is set to reopen on May 15 pending further court proceedings.

More news to follow.   GI Board Memo now included below.

Legal summary follows below from Glen H. Waldman our attorney who is protecting the rights of Grove Isle residents.

Legal update from The Grove Isle Board - April 29

Legal update from The Grove Isle Board – April 29 (click to open)

Advertisements
Tagged , , , , ,

BUS IMAGE

GROVE ISLE RESIDENTS!  WE NEED YOUR PRESENCE FOR THIS IMPORTANT COURT HEARING ON:

MONDAY, APRIL 27, 2015 AT 1:30 P.M.

AT THE

DADE COUNTY COURTHOUSE
73 WEST FLAGLER STREET, 4TH FLOOR

BEFORE JUDGE BRONWYN MILLER

ON OUR MOTION TO KEEP THE CLUB OPEN AND AVOID THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR BEAUTIFUL ISLAND.

IF YOU WANT FREE PRIVATE AIR CONDITIONED BUS TRANSPORTATION TO AND FROM THE COURTHOUSE

PLEASE EMAIL ALAN GOLDFARB BY SUNDAY APRIL 26, 2015 3:00 PM.

agoldfarb@goldfarbpa.com

WE WILL MEET IN BUILDING I LOBBY AND THE BUS WILL LEAVE FROM THE LOT NEXT TO BUILDING I.

PLEASE HAVE YOUR FRIENDS JOIN US.  PLEASE ENSURE TO RSVP WITH NUMBERS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

THERE ARE PLENTY OF PARKING LOTS AROUND THE COURTHOUSE.

(CLICK FOR MAP)

Grove Isle Memo Apr 25 2015

Grove Isle Association Memo April 25 2015 (click to open)

 

Grove Isle Legal Challenge: LET’S GET ON THE BUS!

Tagged , , , ,

CLOSE THE CLUB, ALIENATE THE RESIDENTS, DIVIDE AND CONQUER: A NOVEL STRATEGY

grove isle

Grove Isle Club’s magical views on to Biscayne Bay

 Grove Isle Update — Key Points:

  • The Residents of Grove Isle have initiated legal action to prevent closure of the Grove Isle Club. This legal initiative is to protect the rights of ALL residents against the shuttering of the Club.
  • We envision that upon the Club’s closure, and in the absence of a demolition permit, the club will be allowed to decay causing many health and safety issues on the island
  • The grandfathering rights that currently allow the Club to operate on the island will be lost if the Club is closed for longer than 180 days.  The developer has failed to address how a replacement club would then obtain the City’s permission to operate.
  • Residents of Grove Isle are protected by the legal documents that established Grove Isle in its current form.
  • We have also learned from a number of residents that they have been approached by agents of the developer. He is again working to Divide and Conquer the island reportedly in the hope to resurrect the 18 story tower plan.

Grove Isle Update — The Detail:

With the Developer’s decision to first close parking access and now to permanently close the Grove Isle Club, including its hotel, restaurant, pool, spa and related amenities, residents of the Grove Isle Condominium Association have initiated legal action to prevent closure of the Club. This legal initiative is to protect the rights of ALL residents against the shuttering of the Club.  We envision that upon closure, in the absence of a demolition permit that has not been issued by the City, the structure of the Club—surrounded by a chain link fence– will be allowed to decay. The grounds will not be tended. Not only will this property become an eyesore, health and safety issues are likely to arise if the Club building is abandoned for a prolonged period of time.

GROVE ISLE EMERGENCY COMPLAINT

Grove Isle legal action

Grove Isle legal action was filed on 22 April 2015 (click to open document)

As residents of Grove Isle, we are protected by the legal documents that established Grove Isle in its current form. These documents committed the Club to provide amenities to all of the condominium owners and residents. This commitment now belongs to the Developer per these legal documents, as recorded by the City and signed by the City of Miami.

Miami Herald Grove Isle Story Headline

The Miami Herald updated the story on Grove Isle last night (click image to open)

The Club is a for-profit commercial operation currently serving both Grove Isle Condominium Association members as well as members from off-island. The Grove Isle Condominium Association, a non-profit organization, is a corporation independent of the Club. Under Miami 21—the current zoning law—the Club could not be built on Grove Isle today because Grove Isle is zoned T5-R, and is limited to residential use. However, because the Club has been in existence for decades before Miami 21 became law, it can exist in its current form in its current location. It is grandfathered to continue its operation. But if it is closed for more than 180 days or if there is attempt to move it to another location on the island, it will lose its grandfather status. This is the urgency for prevention of closure of the Club. Furthermore, there is no approval for a new club, and zoning restrictions will prevent such construction.

We have also learned from a number of residents that they have been approached by agents of the developer.  The strategy is to Divide and Conquer.  The claim is that residents of Bldg 1 and 2 stand to gain from this development but a vocal group in Bldg 3 are interfering with building plans, and that this new development, particularly the 18 story tower, will be great for Grove Isle.  In the meantime, the developer is going to keep punishing the island residents for blocking his development until they submit.  Of course, no mention has been made of the three year construction time line, the movement of demolition debris and construction materials necessary to build the equivalent of one of the existing Grove Isle buildings, the environmental damage, the decreased property valuations and the anti-development sentiment expressed at the recent candidate forum by all residents.  And the legal barriers have been reinterpreted as supporting the rights of development (if this were the case, development would have started two years ago!)

The continued action of the Board of Directors of the Grove Isle Condominium Association in preventing this development is greatly appreciated by all residents.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Developer Closes Grove Isle Club?

Having closed shared club and residents parking lots on the island, despite easements to the contrary, the developer has now circulated an open letter regarding the future of the Grove Isle Club, which he owns and operates for the benefit of residents of Grove IsleIn this letter, the developer has asked residents to make a false choice between membership options which effectively compromises their rights and closes the club.  Just how low can you go?

Grove Isle Club

Grove Isle Club Developer message was left at residents’ doors yesterday

The Board of Directors has distributed the following message to residents: “We suggest owners consider withholding any response to the Club letter seeking a membership choice while our legal team evaluates the potential effect on our rights. You will receive further information early next week.” PGI concurs with the Board and believes – especially in the absence of notification to members that the Club would close – that this request of the Club’s owners is deceptive and serves to minimize the responsibility for the abandonment of the Grove Isle Club by the Club owner.  A copy of the Board’s response may be accessed [by clicking here].

PGI strongly believes that residents should not respond to the developer’s proposed options.

Furthermore, with the commissioner candidates for District #2 visiting Grove Isle on 15 April, it will be important to direct to them specific questions concerning development of Grove Isle, the North Grove and Coconut Grove in general.

This is an important opportunity to change the current dynamics by finding politicians that seem more in step with our values.

Grove Isle Coconut Grove Miami DC 2 Election

Grove Isle Invites Miami District 2 Commission Candidates (click image to open)

We provide the following background on this issue for your ease of reference:

  1. All of the residents of Grove Isle are obligatory members of the Grove Isle Club, and pay substantial dues to belong.
  2. The Club provides the amenities for the residents, as meticulously described and defined in the Settlement Agreement of 1977. These amenities are valuable and part of the condominium purchase package.  These include access to the hotel, restaurant, bar, pool deck, function rooms, spa and tennis courts.
  3. None of the resident members of the Club have received any notice of the Club closing. In contrast, members regularly receive multiple announcements via email and/or leafleting of special activities and functions at the Club.
  4. Residents have now received a communication from the Club NOT ANNOUNCING ITS CLOSURE but rather offering members the option of suspending their membership dues while the Grove Isle Club is closed or continue to pay their dues and use the Club at the Biltmore Hotel during this period.
  5. The Developer still has not obtained the necessary permits for construction of a new Club. Specifically, no demolition permit has been issued by the City of Miami.
  6. The current Grove Isle Club is non-conforming to Miami 21 since it is a commercial activity in an area zoned for restricted activities (e.g. residential). If the Grove Isle Club, which is currently grandfathered and thus protected from Miami 21, is shuttered, it will lose its grandfather rights.
  7. Under Miami 21, a new Grove Isle Club cannot be constructed in a T5-R zone. The implication is that upon closure of the Club, Grove Isle will never have another club or its associated amenities.
Tagged , , , ,

Frustrated Developer Attempts to Influence Grove Isle Residents

The Developer has emailed the residents of Grove Isle, bemoaning the fact that he has been unable to work with the Board of Directors of the Grove Isle Condominium Association and requesting collaboration with the Grove Isle residents.

Grove Isle Developer

A rare communication from the developer was sent to residents on Friday evening.

It has been two years to the week that the Developer quietly purchased 4 Grove Isle and he can show no tangible progress regarding his project(s) for Grove Isle.

In brief:

  • He claims to be concerned about residents’ legal costs while he retains legal teams to undermine residents’ rights
  • He claims support from a majority of residents for his plans (when the opposite is true)
  • He makes no mention of the past mediation procedure during which he repeatedly failed to answer the Grove Isle Board’s questions or his attempt to get the land rezoned while repeatedly misquoting the Board’s legal opinion
  • He believes that all works (Residents’ renovations and new development) should be done simultaneously without considering the logistical impossibility of this suggestion (where would we put all the trucks/building equipment?)
  • He attempts to blame his newly introduced parking restrictions on the Board by citing unaddressed safety concerns two whole weeks after the fact and after having attempted to have residents’ cars towed

In detail:

It is now two years to the week that the Developer purchased 4 Grove Isle, and no tangible progress has been made in the demolition of the existing hotel, spa and restaurant and the construction of ultra-luxury condominiums and new club that has been proposed in multiple versions.  He claims to be concerned about the legal expenses to which Grove Isle residents have been subjected.  He espouses that he has the legal right to develop his property and that the vast majority of Grove Isle residents are excited about the new development and a new club. This is in contradiction to the fact that a door-to-door survey with signatures proves that residents by a wide margin REJECT the new development.

Grove Isle Club

Grove Isle Club Members and Residents have long been waiting for answers

There is no mention of the negative messages that the Developer has transmitted to the Grove Isle residents and Board.  He initiated in secret an 18 story condominium tower based on his interpretation of the Settlement Agreement of 1977; during the mediation with the Condo Association initiated by Commissioner Sarnoff, the Developer secretly requested rezoning of a section of his parcel with the City of Miami so that he could construct a high-rise condominium tower (see post of 18 August 2014); most recently, he notified the Board late on a Friday afternoon that tow trucks would remove all cars from his property at 6 am on Monday—despite an easement that makes parking on his property available to the condo association residents.  The tow trucks arrived with a police escort, but an injunction blocked their activity (see post of 22-23 February 2015).  Is this punitive action what he means by “collaboration”?  Is this developer a credible partner with whom we can build our hopes and futures on Grove Isle?

Grove isle

New Grove Isle Club Empty Parking Regime

What the developer fails to acknowledge is that, absent the Settlement Agreement of 1977, he would indeed have the right to build residential structures compliant with the current zoning law, Miami 21Rest assured, if there were no legal barriers to the development of 4 Grove Isle, it would not matter to him at all whether the residents of Grove Isle were for, against or neutral.  Construction would have commenced long ago.  To date, our Board and our attorneys Weiss Serota have properly pointed out to the City of Miami that (1) the Developer has no vested rights to build a fourth 18 story tower—and hence his decision to move toward a horizontal Miami 21-compliant structure; and (2) the Developer cannot move the non-conforming Club to a new location because the property is zoned T-5R—for residential use—whereas the Club is for profit and serves the public, including those on Grove Isle.

It is not certain what the next step is, but messing with City requirements for parking on the island and calling for a united effort to turn the island into a construction site for multiple years represent a bizarre strategy.  In the interim, PGI is joined at the hip with the Board of Directors of the Grove Isle Condominium Association.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Grove Isle: New member-only valet parking policy

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Yesterday the developer sent out the March Grove Isle Club calendar.   On the back is a notice that complimentary valet parking is now being offered to all Club members.   This appears like a retreat on the developer’s previous position (see previous posts).

This last development shows at best poor planning and communication from the developer, or at worst an attempt to manipulate the feelings of as many people on the island as possible.

The simple fact is that Grove Isle could not have been built without enough parking spaces.   An agreed number of shared spaces (our research shows this to be 111 spots) was/is a city requirement.

We trust that the Grove Isle Board will continue to robustly deal with this dispute.

 

Tagged , , , , ,

Grove Isle: developer’s tow trucks ordered off the island

tow truck grove isle

Miami Police were present with tow trucks on Grove Isle at 6am this morning

Extremely rapid action by our Board and lawyers halted the latest parking action by the 4 Grove Isle developer.  An emergency injunction was issued in our favor at 8.19pm on Sunday.  This court order was shown to the police at 6.00am this morning.  The police then ordered the developer’s tow trucks off the island.  The Board expects the matter to be addressed in court later this week.

A copy of the Board’s latest memo regarding this matter follows below (click image to open).

grove isle parking developer injunction

GI Board memo regarding injunction regarding developer’s parking action (click image to open)

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Grove Isle (Over) Development 101

Rendering of Sailboat Key (38 Storey)

Rendering of Sailboat Key / Grove Isle (4 x 38 Storey)

The goal of Preserve Grove Isle is to provide to residents of Grove Isle and the public in general accurate and objective information related to the history of development and the legal issues related to proposed development of 4 Grove Isle.  We have worked to provide accurate and detailed information to make certain that the issues before Grove Isle, Grove Isle Associates (the Developer) and the City of Miami are transparent.  After all, “sunshine” is what makes Miami, and sunshine on these issues is good for the public interest.

Please scroll down to read a summary of our research.

Sailboat Key (Grove Isle) 4 Towers & Club with Parking

Sailboat Key / Grove Isle Towers, Club with Extensive Parking

To this end, under the “Documents” tab on the home page, we have made available public documents, including contracts, filings, permits, and plans related to the proposed development of 4 Grove Isle.  Some of these documents are very old, dating back into the 1970’s, whereas others are recent.  These documents provide the legal basis for our claim that the Settlement Agreement of 1977, signed by the City of Miami, the then owner/developers and those from Coconut Grove who originally opposed the proposed plan of development of Sailboat Key on Fair Isle, limits further development of Grove Isle.

Alternative Rendering of Sailboat Key (1500 Car spaces)

Alternative Rendering of Sailboat Key / Grove Isle

In summary, the documents show:

1]  Grove Isle’s original development was complicated by legal and political action.  The local community was in total opposition to the development and expressly the overdevelopment of an undeveloped island with its plan to build four 40 story towers with 2000 units and 1500 parking spaces.

2]  The process resulted in a compromise that shaped the island as we see it now. After significant litigation, the Settlement of 1977 defined what would be allowed and the location of all of the elements, including the club on the eastern shore of the island.

3]  Building permits were issued, three 18 story towers and one five story tower were built and certificates of occupancy issued—all within the constraints of the Settlement of 1977.

4] Sale of 4 Grove Isle in March 2013 and plan to build an 18 story residential tower on the site of the hotel/restaurant/club—after over 30 years without change on the island.

5] Weiss-Serota Memorandum of Law claiming the absence of vested rights to build an 18 story tower based on the Settlement of 1977 and the importance of current zoning law, Miami 21.

Grove Isle Condominiums and Club Rendering

Grove Isle Condominiums and Club Rendering

For access to the PGI document archive please go to the DOCUMENTS section of this web site. .

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Grove Isle lawyers fault developer’s latest plan

As announced on this site on 15 January, the Board of Directors of the Grove Isle Condominium Association received notice that the Developer had received approval of the five story plan submitted to the City of Miami.  The City Zoning Administrator determined that the proposed five story plan for 62 condominiums and a new club is consistent with Miami 21, the current zoning law.  The Board of Directors, through their attorneys Weiss Serota, appealed this determination on 31 December.

The appeal (click to open) is presented in full below.

grove isle t5r

Grove Isle is zoned T5-R

In summary, the appeal argues that the current zoning, T5-R, for 4 Grove Isle is 100% residential.  The current club is a for profit facility open to the public, including those that do not reside at 4 Grove Isle (i.e. those residing at 1, 2 and 3 Grove Isle).  In its current location, it is non-conforming regarding the zoning ordinances since it was built and opened long before Miami 21.  However, to relocate it to a site on tennis courts facing the marina, it must conform to Miami 21.  And as a commercial entity—restaurant, store, spa, etc.—it does not conform to Miami 21 since Miami 21 requires only residential units in this location (zoned  T5-R). 

grove isle appeal

Grove Isle residents appeal developer’s latest plans (click image to open)

We look forward to hearing the response and will share it when it is available

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Grove Isle Rebuts Developer’s Moves with Appeals

Grove Isle Residents Association recently reported that the City of Miami’s Zoning Administrator has determined that the latest five story proposal for 4 Grove Isle is consistent with its zoning regulations, known as Miami 21Grove Isle’s lawyers are appealing this administrative decision.  The decision on compliance with current zoning laws is completely independent of the terms of the 1977 Settlement Agreement—the agreement signed by the City to allow development of Grove Isle. 

Meanwhile the developer’s request for a demolition permit for 4 Grove Isle is still pending before the city.  Grove Isle’s Association has reconfirmed that they will also challenge this request.  Demolition without agreement on a final solution for 4 Grove Isle risks substantially damaging values and amenities for residents of Grove Isle if a debris field/bulldozed site is generated without a building permit for planned development.

Grove isle Board Jan 2015

Grove Isle Board Memo Jan 9, 2015 (click on image to open document)

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Grove Isle Board issues update on proposed development

The Grove Isle Condo Association has recently updated residents with details regarding the Developer’s new plan for the island. The new proposal foresees a tower of 168 feet and 12 stories high. As such, it represents a 20% height reduction from his  original proposal. It is important to note that this height information is meaningless, as no other data (for example, building volume and footprint) has been provided, despite requests for more information made months ago in the mediation process.

Latest moves made on 4 Grove Isle Condominium Board site

More moves on 4 Grove Isle site

It appears that the Developer’s application to rezone his section of the island has not yet been confirmed for hearing by the City’s Planning and Zoning Appeals Board.  Rezoning part of Grove Isle is an attempt to force the City’s hand and throw out Miami21’s relevance in the North Grove.  It’s a slippery slope — a decision to allow rezoning 4 Grove Isle may facilitate the eventual rezoning of the whole North Coconut Grove coastline.

Grove Isle North Grove

Rezoning of Grove Isle could lead to the rezoning of much of the surrounding waterfront.

A copy of the latest Board memo is available below (click image to open).

Grove Isle Association Board Memo Aug 28 2014

Grove Isle Association Board Memo Aug 28 2014

Tagged , , , , , ,

Rezoning Tactic: Developer Applies to City of Miami to Rezone 4 Grove Isle

As Grove Isle goes, so goes the North Grove: Potential for waterfront high rises linking downtown Coconut Grove to Brickell

As Grove Isle goes, so goes the North Grove: Potential for waterfront high rises linking downtown Coconut Grove to Brickell

In July, Grove Isle Associates LLP submitted the document (see below) requesting rezoning of approximately half of 4 Grove Isle—specifically the 3 acres currently occupied by the hotel/restaurant/spa.  In contrast to a variance, where an owner requests a waiver from the current zoning law (i.e. Miami21), this is a request to rezone this portion of the property from T5 to T6-8, thus allowing the building of a condominium tower along the plans originally proposed.  Such a tower would then be in compliance with Miami 21.  There is no request to rezone the other 4 acres, now zoned as T5.

4 Grove Isle Drive Rezoning Application Folio 01-4114-002-0010

4 Grove Isle Drive Rezoning Application Folio 01-4114-002-0010 (click image to open)

Rationale:  The primary argument for rezoning  half of 4 Grove Isle is that the adjacent buildings (i.e. 1,2,3 Grove Isle) are high density buildings, and changing the zoning of 4 Grove Isle will not significantly change the character of the island.  The application argues that existing buildings at Grove Isle are in effect T6-8 buildings, the proposed T 6-8 development on 4 Grove Isle property would fit with the neighborhood. Therefore, they argue that the zone change is harmonious and consistent  with the surrounding Grove Isle buildings.  However, 1,2 and 3 Grove Isle are non-compliant with Miami 21, having been built before proper zoning controls were in place.  One might argue now that allowing high density buildings on Grove Isle in 1977 was an error caused by the absence of strict zoning laws and the pro-development attitude at the time.  Urban planners would now properly propose that high density/high rises do not belong on the waterfront but should be set back from the waterfront so that there is a gradual continuum from the waterfront of low rise, then medium rise then high rise development.  Indeed, this is one of the fundamental principles of Miami 21—with a goal of avoiding the Miami Beach and north situation of beach front high rises.

Miami21 zoning of Grove Isle and North Coconut Grove

Miami21 zoning of Grove Isle and North Coconut Grove

The Rezoning Process:  For this rezoning application, the Planning Department of the City of Miami is only charged with reviewing the rezoning application and not in the larger sense of how the rezoning and new development is linked to the 1977 SSA or the 5 year litigation history from 1973-77 that lead to the 1977 Settlement Agreement. Any rezoning must be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Miami.  City Council has the ultimate decision-making responsibility on rezoning.

Implications for rezoning:  Rezoning will lead to construction of a large luxury condominium tower.  All of the issues of access to the island, damage to the causeway, storage of materials, etc will greatly impact not only Grove Isle but residents of North Grove and Coconut Grove.  See earlier post of 25 June.

North Grove Rezoning Threat

North Grove Rezoning Threat Appears

Rezoning Benefits Whom?    Will rezoning of 4 Grove Isle benefit you?  The public will see no benefits. 

Indeed, the public will no longer have access to a public restaurant and boutique hotel.  There will be no aesthetic contribution to the region and a negative contribution to the environment, including Biscayne Bay.  There will be no benefits to the residents of Grove Isle.  Property values are already sagging in a market in which the rest of Miami continues an upward trend.  The developers will be the sole beneficiaries, as measured financially.  In sum, this is all about money.  The developers recently bought this property with the idea of quick, fast track financial gain.

Grove Isle North Grove

Rezoning of Grove Isle could leading to rezoning of much of the surrounding waterfront.

Implications:   Rezoning represents a legal approach to circumventing zoning laws.  The process is significantly different than that employed  for application of a variance.  Miami has a long history of being pro-development, and changes to the zoning of Grove Isle could portend efforts to rezone much of the waterfront on the nearby mainland in the North Grove, thus allowing contiguous high rise development from downtown Coconut Grove to Brickell.  This would logically complete high density development all along  western Biscayne Bay.

But is it good for Miami in the long run?  Grove Isle is the canary in the coal mine—Could this be the beginning of a domino effect of high density development in areas zoned otherwise?

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Grove Isle briefed by legal advisors on development threat

Rowing on Biscayne Bay - Grove Isle

Ready to pull hard as crew sets off near Grove Isle

Attorneys representing our Association and working with the Board, presented their thoughts on the proposed development on Grove Isle and the status of on-going litigation to the Association members that were able to attend on Monday evening.  This meeting was well attended and the presentation enlightening.  In initial comments, Gilberto Pastoriza of Weiss Serota confirmed that he was hired by the Association to investigate the legal basis for the rapid development of the tower proposal (now known as Plan A) by the current owners of 4 Grove Isle, with Mr. Avila as the spokesperson for this consortium.

82v4t

Gilberto Pastoriza of Weiss Serota briefs residents on the developer’s proposals for Grove Isle

Mr Pastoriza emphasized that this development, unbeknownst to the members of the Association, was on a fast track for approval by the city.  “The train was going full speed.  Our job was to stop the train.”  Indeed, with their preparation of the Memorandum questioning the legality of vested rights from the Settlement of 1977 and its distribution to city officials, the developer’s plan is now on hold by the City. This presentation, which was in depth, was successful and informational.  They mentioned that there are various points of view from Association members, including those most concerned about amenities, those most concerned about protracted construction, and those most concerned about any construction on Grove Isle in general.

82vd6+

John Lukacs of Hinshaw & Culbertson updates residents regarding the Association’s successful appeal

It also became clear that the Association members are dependent on a second party, the owners of 4 Grove Isle, to provide them most of the amenities that the Association enjoys (e.g. tennis courts, fitness center/spa, restaurant) and yet the owners, who operate these facilities at a profit, may (or may not—that is a legal issue) have the right to discontinue such amenities.  Mr. Avila’s Plan B includes discontinuation of many of the amenities that the Association members have enjoyed over the past 30+ years but is said to be within the current zoning ordinances of Miami 21.  In addition, John Lukacs of Hinshaw & Culbertson, who also represents the Association, discussed the reversal by the appellate court of the pending suit by the Association against the Club (i.e. 4 Grove Isle), and this suit will be litigated once again, hopefully to the advantage of the Association and its members.

Appeal Report Image

The pending suit by the Association against the Club (i.e. 4 Grove Isle) will likely be litigated once again

The lawyers claimed that the Association members on Grove Isle do NOT have to choose between two bad choices, Plan A (the tower) versus Plan B (5 five story buildings occupying much of the land that is owned by the developer). They emphasized that we have other options….and we, the residents of Grove Isle, are empowered to decide what we want for our future here.

It is now clear from the predictions of the recent poll that a majority of the residents on the island want no development based on what they have seen and heard. “The Grove Isle opinion poll continues to assess the views of Association members and is surpassing our expectations.”  It seems as the entire island is waking up to the fact that they really enjoy this island “the way it is”.  Like the old adage, “you take your health for granted until you lose it,” we don’t always appreciate something important in our lives—including the ambience of Grove Isle–until we are about to lose it.

We will be headed for a requested mediation (non binding) with the city, the developer and Grove Isle representatives on 21 April.  It is very possible that this start date may be delayed.  We feel that this mediation will expose the “no further development position” to all, based upon the opinion poll in progress.

Please keep your letters and e-mails going out to the Miami administrators and elected officials….they are very valuable.  You will find this info on this site at this location (click here).

Thank you for the many, many comments and opinions on this PGI website.  It shows the interest and unity of the Grove Isle residents.  It is times such as this that bring a community together.

You may also now follow developments and share information regarding our island on Facebook and Google+. Click on the icons below for a link to these sites.

Facebook Connect Link

Connect with Facebook

Google+ Button

Add Google+

 

 

.

 

 

 

Tagged , , , , ,

Grove Isle campaign seeks residents opinion on developer proposal

Grove Isle is in Coconut Grove

Preserve Grove Isle

Dear Fellow Neighbors

We are all getting bombarded with lots of information about the potential changes of our wonderful island home.   We are delighted that residents are very interested in our future. For this reason we would like to get a sense of how YOU feel.

To accomplish this goal one of your neighbors will come around to ask your opinion YES or NO in terms of whether you wish to have any high density construction on the island or not. We all realize that this topic is of paramount importance to the future life style and setting of Grove Isle.

Please note that the Condominium Association lawyers will present an information meeting for all Grove Isle owners on Monday 7 April.  Further information regarding this is included in the document attached below.

Grove Isle Condo Association Memo - 1 April 2014

Grove Isle Condo Association Memo – 1 April 2014 (click image to open)

Thank you for your support to protect our Grove Isle.  Please check the communication section for all the latest thoughts, information and developments regarding our collective home.

 

 

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Grove Isle Association issues clarification regarding development presentation

A copy of the latest memorandum from the Grove Isle Condominium Association re the developer’s presentation is attached for your information.   To read the memo please click the image below.

Grove Isle Condo Assoc Memo 19 March 2014

Grove Isle Condo Assoc Memo 19 March 2014

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Miami Herald: “Grove Isle condo owners upset about plans for fourth tower”

Grove Isle Residents unhappy with development

Miami Herald — Grove Isle Residents unhappy with development (March 7, 2014)

The Miami Herald has now picked up on our 4 Grove Isle situation. The story was published on the “front page” of the Miami Herald’s Business section today!  This is a giant step in spreading and explaining our deep concerns regarding this proposed construction.  Notably, it confirms that the City of Miami has NOT made ANY decisions regarding our island.

Thank you for all of your continued support and concern for the future of our GROVE ISLE.
comment bulldozer image
Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Preserve Grove Isle Committee responds to developer (Grove Isle Associates) e-mail dated 27 February 2014

AERIAL VISTA OF THE THREE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ON GROVE ISLE

AERIAL VISTA OF THE THREE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ON GROVE ISLE (click image to open video)

The recent email and letter (of 27 February 2014) sent to every owner/member of the Grove Isle Club by the new developer was replete with omissions and inaccuracies.

THE TRUTH

1. Their architect’s computer image is inaccurate as to the distance between buildings 3 and the proposed new 18 story glass and concrete high-rise. They have portrayed the distance as a substantial distance when, in fact, these plans call for the proposed building to be 40% closer to building 3 than building 3 is to building 2.

2. The developer DOES NOT presently enjoy a right to construct a residential tower on the island. Neither the City nor any court has made a determination that there is a right to develop as of this time.

3. The former deputy City Attorney (in February 13, 2013) did not state that the development group has the right to build what it presented. She merely commented on a letter espousing one view of governing documents. That argument and her position on it is currently under-re-evaluation by the City Attorney’s office based on our attorneys’ well-reasoned memorandum of law. Any development will not depend solely on the City Attorney, however, since it is the Planning, Zoning, and Building departments that make those decisions after following various administrative procedures, many of which are subject to appeal to the Planning and Zoning Appeals Board and the City Commission. None of this has occurred yet.

4. The developer is interested in doing what is BEST for the developer and not for Grove Isle #1, #2 or #3, and its existing 510 apartments It is beyond naïve to think that the developer is truly concerned about long time Grove Isle residents. He is concerned with maximizing his economic return on his $24 million investment. He should be aware that the gross value of the existing apartments on Grove Isle is well over $400 million dollars!

5. The developer has not submitted plans for new club facilities (or tennis courts). Rather, he depicted a rendering of a club room and state “Subject to Change”. How can anyone rely on a developer who fails to advise and show all of his plans in advance? Why not reveal exactly what they plan on building?

6. The developer’s threat of building more units if we don’t agree with his plans is merely an attempt to bully and threaten Grove Isle owners. Any proposal would have to be reviewed by the City’s Planning and Zoning Department. No such proposal has been submitted or reviewed.

7. The developer will not get the City or a Court to approve another 445 units. These threats from the developer must stop!!! If you want to be our Grove Isle neighbor, act like one and stop your threatening tactics.

8. There are numerous other issues that the developer will have to address before proceeding, that go beyond zoning and planning and land usage:

a. What happens to our bridge when heavy construction vehicles cross it?
b. How do they remove hundreds of tons of debris from Grove Isle?
c. How will they deliver hundreds of tons of building materials such as concrete, steel and glass?
d. How many parking spaces will Grove Isle #1, #2 and #3 lose with this construction and thereafter?
e. How does the developer’s plan impact our traffic and South Bayshore Drive traffic?
f. What does DERM have to say about this project?
g. Will this plan comply with sewer, water and other City issues?
h. How will this construction match or fit with existing structures? Will the tropical “state of the island” be lost?
i. Honestly, how long will this project take……we feel 2 years minimum.

The entire development approval process has many different paths. The length of time to complete this process is uncertain under normal circumstances, and will be made more so if the Grove Isle Association and residents are uncooperative. We feel we are in the beginning stages of what could end up being a protracted process. The developer’s only hope of developing within a reasonable period of time is to negotiate with us and ultimately provide a mutually satisfactory solution.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Grove Isle Board respond to recent developer communications

As you may be aware, the Board and Committee has written two responses to threatening communications from the developer.  Copies of these are included below for your ease of reference.  The Committee awaits legal advice and will respond to developments regarding the project shortly.

Grove Isle Board response

Grove Isle Board response to developer (21 February 2014)

Grove Isle Board response to developer communications (28 February 2014)

Grove Isle Board response to developer (28 February 2014)

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Grove Isle residents seriously challenged by proposed high density development

Dear Grove Isle Resident,

Welcome to the first island wide e-mail and web based communications program. We hope to enable a better and faster method of communications in order to improve our Grove Isle quality of life.

A threat to Grove Isle

Grove Isle Under Threat

As most of you already know, there is a proposal to construct an 18 story glass and concrete high-rise building at the tropical tip of Grove Isle. The plans reveal that this structure will sit very close to Building Three and will replace the current Grove Isle Hotel, The club restaurant, social areas, bar and swimming pool.  We may lose our walking path and the right to access the area.

The construction time span estimate has ranged from 1 ½ years to 2 ½ years. Many people feel that this modern structure would forever change the tropical and special environment of Grove Isle.

The newly formed Preserve Grove isle Committee, supported by the Grove Isle Board of Directors has been established, together with this special newsletter and email, to oppose this long term construction. We feel that this glass building would be detrimental and destructive to the character and aesthetics of our tropical island.

Over the last few weeks a large number of residents have asked how to stop or alter this situation.  We formed the Preserve Grove Isle Committee to accomplish exactly that.

The first step in our opposition to this proposed building was to organize a powerful legal team to begin to formulate the needed steps in areas of zoning, land use and preservation of land style. This step has been taken and the work is in progress.

The next step is to activate the “social opposition” to this project, which we find to be very strong. To begin this step we ask you all to join us in our loud and vocal opposition to this by sending a very important and urgent message to a few important Miami authorities that need to hear our position. They will take our opposition to this project very seriously. Your voices will be heard.

Here is what to do:

SEND YOUR PERSONAL E-MAILS AND LETTERS IN A STAMPED ENVELOPE TO THESE MIAMI OFFICIALS. USE THIS SAMPLE LETTER OR USE YOUR OWN WORDS AND FEELINGS.

Demolition Grove Isle wriote officials

Yours,

PRESERVE GROVE ISLE COMMITTEE

Disclaimer:  All the information on this website is published in good faith and for general information purpose only. We do not make any warranties about the completeness, reliability and accuracy of this information. Any action you take upon the information on our website is strictly at your own risk. We will not be liable for any losses and damages in connection with the use of our mail, website or links.  This site and e-mail’s commentary, opinions, and recommendations represent the casual, personal and subjective views of the authors and are subject to change.  You may opt-out from this site or mailings at any time via the options on the contact page or the ‘follow’ dialogue box at the bottom of this page.
mailing list image
Tagged , , , , , ,

Grove Isle | Coconut Grove | Miami

Grove Isle

Grove Isle, Miami — A proposed high density development risks damaging the neighborhood.  The Preserve Grove Isle (PGI) campaign supports residents’ efforts to halt a development project proposed for the Grove Isle Hotel and Resort site.  This project involves the demolition of the Grove Isle Hotel and Club and its replacement with a 18 story residential tower or numerous “5” story* residential structures that wrap around the island.  This project will destroy Grove Isle’s natural balance and superb amenities that have been enjoyed for many years.  The Grove Isle Condominium Association’s  attorneys have already noted that the developer’s project marks “a stunning departure from established law in reversing more than 30 years of legislation.”  Furthermore, there are also serious concerns about the proposed project’s environmental impact and the damage it would cause to the North Grove neighborhood.  Please read on to acquaint yourself with the latest developments and issues regarding this high density development in Grove Isle and North Coconut Grove.

* T5 Zoning may mean the proposed structures are actually equivalent to 8 stories high.

Site views:  +85,000
Subscribers: +1,300
(see bottom of page for latest stats)

Tagged , , , , , , ,
%d bloggers like this: